Common Conditions
Top Products
Top Prescriptions
LIVE US SUPPORT
M-F 8am-9pm EST
Sat 9am-5:30pm EST
1177 Words. 5 minute read.
Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) has undergone significant evolution in recent years, with innovations in delivery systems providing clinicians with more options to personalize treatment approaches.
As the clinical landscape evolves and continues to grow, staying informed about these advancements may help optimize patient outcomes while minimizing adverse effects.
This article examines the most recent trends in TRT, with particular focus on novel delivery methods that are transforming the standard of care.
The prevalence of male hypogonadism continues to increase, partly due to greater awareness among both patients and providers which in turn increases diagnoses.
According to recent data, hypogonadism affects just under 40% of men aged 45 and older, with prevalence rates increasing with age.
Educational initiatives targeting both practitioners and patients have contributed significantly to improved diagnosis rates yet treatment initiation rates remain relatively low.
There are several theories as to why. First off, there are patient and physician concerns about limitations of older delivery methods.
Older formulations ran the risk of liver strain and potential toxicity as exogenous testosterone injections had been found to elevate liver enzymes and which could cause damage with long-term use. Moreover, due to where it was being processed, the liver would metabolize much of the testosterone before it could enter the bloodstream, requiring higher doses which then raises the risk of liver damage.
Many eligible patients decline therapy due to concerns about injection discomfort, gel transfer risks, or inconvenient administration protocols. Similarly, some clinicians may hesitate to prescribe TRT when considering the potential drawbacks of available options and patient preferences.
These barriers to treatment highlight the importance of innovations in delivery systems that address these concerns.
The TRT landscape has expanded dramatically from its originally limited options.
Let’s cover a few of them.
While intramuscular injections of testosterone cypionate and enanthate remain common, advances include:
Topical formulations have evolved to address past limitations:
Subcutaneous implants continue to improve with:
Additional innovative delivery methods include:
Perhaps the most significant recent advancement has been the reemergence of oral testosterone as a viable option.
Previous oral formulations faced substantial limitations due to hepatotoxicity concerns and poor bioavailability. There are two in question that we would like to highlight.
Testosterone undecanoate, patented under the brand name Kyzatrex, represents one such shift in oral testosterone delivery. This FDA-approved formulation employs a novel lymphatic absorption pathway that fundamentally changes how oral testosterone is processed:
Clinical data demonstrates Kyzatrex maintains serum testosterone within the normal physiologic range (300-1000 ng/dL) in over 87% of treated patients, with minimal hepatic impact even after extended treatment periods.
This treatment modality actually doesn’t involve exogenous testosterone at all. Instead, these drugs are classed as Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator (SERM). What that means is they stimulate the body’s testosterone production by interacting with excess estrogen in the bloodstream.
This innovative approach offers several significant advantages:
The results confirm efficacy with one study for clomiphene citrate seeing that 88% of men treated for more than three years achieved the proper levels of testosterone with only 8% experiencing side effects.
These advances in delivery technology directly impact clinical decision-making in several important ways:
Previously, TRT treatment came down to injections of testosterone enanthate. As you’ve read above, the significantly expanded array of delivery options enables more tailored approaches based on:
Different delivery systems present distinct side effect profiles:
The FDA continues to emphasize that TRT should only be prescribed for medical conditions causing hypogonadism confirmed by laboratory tests, not for age-related testosterone decline or non-specific symptoms of aging.
Guidelines also reinforce the need for regular monitoring of hematocrit, PSA, and lipid profiles during treatment.
These changes aim to enhance patient safety and ensure appropriate TRT use.
When determining the most appropriate delivery system, clinicians might consider:
The reemergence of oral testosterone formulations like Kyzatrex, clomiphene citrate, enclomiphene represents a particularly important advancement in treating Low-T, potentially offering improved treatment adherence and reduced side effect profiles.
That said, there are still more innovations on the horizon.
There are new technologies in development, including smart delivery systems with programmable release patterns, biodegradable long-term implants requiring only annual replacement, and combination formulations addressing multiple aspects of male hormonal health.
As with all therapeutic decisions, an individualized approach based on patient factors could lead to optimal outcomes.
Staying informed about these advances in TRT delivery systems may help clinicians mitigate potential risks for patients as they undergo treatment.
Looking to learn more? Click here to access our provider webinar covering KYZATREX, presented by Dr. John Mulhall.
Remember, the menMD support teams are here to streamline your practice by handling patient education, basic questions, and medication troubleshooting, freeing you to focus on delivering exceptional care.